What No-Code Gets Wrong About Design
No-code tools have democratized development—but not design. I’ve seen too many beautiful UIs wrecked by bad class structures in Webflow or clunky layouts in Softr. Just because you can build something without code doesn’t mean you should skip design thinking.
I worked with a founder who wanted a landing page for their AI tool. They’d already built it themselves in a drag-and-drop editor. It was functional, but the structure was chaotic, the hierarchy was off, and the page didn’t convert. We started from scratch—this time with intentional UX flows, visual rhythm, and CTA placement informed by actual user behavior. The revised version got a 3x higher conversion rate.
Design insight: No-code makes building easier, but it doesn’t replace design intuition. You still need the eye, the flow, and the story.
More Stories You Might Fancy
Buy this template